Student athletes
are a unique species of individuals who must delicately balance playing the
roles of both a full-time student and a full-time athlete. At Milton High
School, a large percentage of students are involved in school sports. One prerequisite
for students attending Milton High is that they must take P.E. every year. This
class is designed to fill a list of requirements including getting kids active,
increasing their fitness, and teaching them about sportsmanship, teamwork, and the
rules to a variety of games. However, I would argue that for students who
participate in sports, P.E. is redundant. I believe that student athletes
should not be required to take gym while they are playing a sport.
Student athletes
receive adequate exercise while playing a sport. Practices are longer than the
typical gym class. For many, practices are frequently two or more hours, while
gym class lasts around one hour. In addition, sport specific workouts are more
intense. These factors increase the athlete’s fitness. If playing a sport does
indeed improve your fitness, isn’t it rather unnecessary to participate in a
class who’s objective is to do that same exact task?
P.E. class also
seeks to measure your athleticism through a variety of tests such as running a
mile, doing the v-sit, or completing the shuttle run. However, I wonder if your
flexibility, endurance, strength, etc. can be accurately measured after lunch or
before a big math test. For individuals who play a sport, athleticism is
appropriately measured during games, meets, or competitions. Again, this factor
points to the conclusion that gym is rather redundant for students who
participate in sports.
P.E. class
strives to teach students about sportsmanship, teamwork, along with the rules
to an assortment of games. This attempt is somewhat successful, but not
completely. In gym class, the sport you play and the team you are on switch
daily. This can be problematic seeing how individuals never get to experience the
true feeling of repeatedly working together for a common goal. I believe that
students who are on a sports team have a deeper, more profound understanding
for sportsmanship and teamwork. They achieve meaningful wins and suffer through
losses together. For individuals who participate in sports, gym class is
unnecessary and repetitive because they learn the true meaning of these
respective lessons while playing with their team.
I would offer a
couple of solutions to this problem. First, I would suggest that throughout the
time that an individual played a sport, they would not be required to take gym.
Rather, they would have to take either a health or nutrition class. These
classes would be equally beneficial to the athletes as gym would be to non-athletes.
I would also suggest that instead of gym, athletes could have a study hall
period, seeing as they have two or more hours of sports after school consuming
their time. However, I recognize that this second suggestion could elicit some
negative feedback from those individuals who participate in the musical or the
music programs seeing as they put in just as much time after school as the
athletes.
Caitlin, this is a really good post, maybe your strongest of the year. You have addressed a controversial - but timeless - issue. I think your final comment is probably the most correct. I think principals, who do have the authority to override students' P.E. requirement, are reluctant to exempt students from gym for just that reason. I think also that some P.E. teachers might be worried that too many P.E. exemptions might lead to fewer P.E. teaching jobs. Would a student be exempt for playing one season of a freshman sport? What happens if an athlete "rides the bench," and never really plays? For these reasons, principals rarely grant students an exemption from gym. I like your suggestion that instead of P.E., students who play sports take a health or nutrition course. This sounds like a great idea. Overall, I thought this was a well thought-out and logical post. I even like that you recognized the complexity of the issue in your final paragraph.
ReplyDeleteTwo technical notes: As a general rule, I would be careful writing in the second person. You switch half way through this post from a third person perspective to a second person perspective. Narrative consistency is important. Also, you mixed up "who's" and "whose." Be careful.
Regardless, this is very strong. Good job.